<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch, Michael Arrington, and a Lesson in Work-Life Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/</link>
	<description>I would say my greatest strength is probably data entry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 04:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Tryfon</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tryfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-19</guid>
		<description>First off, great writing here.
Although no one deserves another humans spit in their face Arrington has become well know at driving readership and traffic. In fact in my humble opinion he is the master many of us need to learn from.  This brings me to point #2

Is it possible, in just a minuscule way that all of this Le Web controversy and the events that took place afterwords and even the recent events that have unfolded have been concocted as a way to drive PR?

I wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, great writing here.<br />
Although no one deserves another humans spit in their face Arrington has become well know at driving readership and traffic. In fact in my humble opinion he is the master many of us need to learn from.  This brings me to point #2</p>
<p>Is it possible, in just a minuscule way that all of this Le Web controversy and the events that took place afterwords and even the recent events that have unfolded have been concocted as a way to drive PR?</p>
<p>I wonder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Tryfon</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tryfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>First off, great writing here.
Although no one deserves another humans spit in their face Arrington has become well know at driving readership and traffic. In fact in my humble opinion he is the master many of us need to learn from.  This brings me to point #2

Is it possible, in just a minuscule way that all of this Le Web controversy and the events that took place afterwords and even the recent events that have unfolded have been concocted as a way to drive PR?

I wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, great writing here.<br />
Although no one deserves another humans spit in their face Arrington has become well know at driving readership and traffic. In fact in my humble opinion he is the master many of us need to learn from.  This brings me to point #2</p>
<p>Is it possible, in just a minuscule way that all of this Le Web controversy and the events that took place afterwords and even the recent events that have unfolded have been concocted as a way to drive PR?</p>
<p>I wonder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Drew:

I have read TechCrunch off and on since its inception.  I liked the articles, but once Michael Arrington started sharing his opinions in the comments section it quickly became apparent that his opinions were way off-base.  

I assume he was arrogant before his success, and that success only made it worse.  Not only is he arrogant, but he&#039;s unpleasant and antagonistic.

I had heard about some friction with Loic from Mike&#039;s tweets on Twitter, but until this post I did not realize the full nature of the dispute.

I was very surprised to learn of his fairly obnoxious personality, but I am not surprised that it has come to this.

I suspect that his &#039;vacation&#039; is just to recharge and reevaluate, but I do not expect any significant change of heart.  The zebra can&#039;t change its stripes.

Despite all this, I attribute the increase in animosity to Loic.  It says a lot about Loic as well.  The best course would have been to just chalk it up to a &#039;crazy American&#039; and let it drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew:</p>
<p>I have read TechCrunch off and on since its inception.  I liked the articles, but once Michael Arrington started sharing his opinions in the comments section it quickly became apparent that his opinions were way off-base.  </p>
<p>I assume he was arrogant before his success, and that success only made it worse.  Not only is he arrogant, but he&#8217;s unpleasant and antagonistic.</p>
<p>I had heard about some friction with Loic from Mike&#8217;s tweets on Twitter, but until this post I did not realize the full nature of the dispute.</p>
<p>I was very surprised to learn of his fairly obnoxious personality, but I am not surprised that it has come to this.</p>
<p>I suspect that his &#8216;vacation&#8217; is just to recharge and reevaluate, but I do not expect any significant change of heart.  The zebra can&#8217;t change its stripes.</p>
<p>Despite all this, I attribute the increase in animosity to Loic.  It says a lot about Loic as well.  The best course would have been to just chalk it up to a &#8216;crazy American&#8217; and let it drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Drew:

I have read TechCrunch off and on since its inception.  I liked the articles, but once Michael Arrington started sharing his opinions in the comments section it quickly became apparent that his opinions were way off-base.  

I assume he was arrogant before his success, and that success only made it worse.  Not only is he arrogant, but he&#039;s unpleasant and antagonistic.

I had heard about some friction with Loic from Mike&#039;s tweets on Twitter, but until this post I did not realize the full nature of the dispute.

I was very surprised to learn of his fairly obnoxious personality, but I am not surprised that it has come to this.

I suspect that his &#039;vacation&#039; is just to recharge and reevaluate, but I do not expect any significant change of heart.  The zebra can&#039;t change its stripes.

Despite all this, I attribute the increase in animosity to Loic.  It says a lot about Loic as well.  The best course would have been to just chalk it up to a &#039;crazy American&#039; and let it drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew:</p>
<p>I have read TechCrunch off and on since its inception.  I liked the articles, but once Michael Arrington started sharing his opinions in the comments section it quickly became apparent that his opinions were way off-base.  </p>
<p>I assume he was arrogant before his success, and that success only made it worse.  Not only is he arrogant, but he&#8217;s unpleasant and antagonistic.</p>
<p>I had heard about some friction with Loic from Mike&#8217;s tweets on Twitter, but until this post I did not realize the full nature of the dispute.</p>
<p>I was very surprised to learn of his fairly obnoxious personality, but I am not surprised that it has come to this.</p>
<p>I suspect that his &#8216;vacation&#8217; is just to recharge and reevaluate, but I do not expect any significant change of heart.  The zebra can&#8217;t change its stripes.</p>
<p>Despite all this, I attribute the increase in animosity to Loic.  It says a lot about Loic as well.  The best course would have been to just chalk it up to a &#8216;crazy American&#8217; and let it drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the apparent contradiction in my last comment. Please, let me clarify. He doesn&#039;t have millions of readers for each of his articles. 2.17 million people read TechCrunch in December. How many of these people do you think reader every single article? How many have read more than one article? 

Even so, he does have a lot of sway within the tech sector. Perhaps a more revealing stat here is the number of tech insiders read TC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the apparent contradiction in my last comment. Please, let me clarify. He doesn&#8217;t have millions of readers for each of his articles. 2.17 million people read TechCrunch in December. How many of these people do you think reader every single article? How many have read more than one article? </p>
<p>Even so, he does have a lot of sway within the tech sector. Perhaps a more revealing stat here is the number of tech insiders read TC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the apparent contradiction in my last comment. Please, let me clarify. He doesn&#039;t have millions of readers for each of his articles. 2.17 million people read TechCrunch in December. How many of these people do you think reader every single article? How many have read more than one article? 

Even so, he does have a lot of sway within the tech sector. Perhaps a more revealing stat here is the number of tech insiders read TC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the apparent contradiction in my last comment. Please, let me clarify. He doesn&#8217;t have millions of readers for each of his articles. 2.17 million people read TechCrunch in December. How many of these people do you think reader every single article? How many have read more than one article? </p>
<p>Even so, he does have a lot of sway within the tech sector. Perhaps a more revealing stat here is the number of tech insiders read TC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Millions of TechCrunch readers adopt his opinions regarding tech startups.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He doesn&#039;t have anywhere near a million readers. 

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/&quot;&gt;TechCrunch, which began reviewing start-ups and tech-centric news in 2005, had 650,000 unique U.S. visitors in December — and 2.17 million visitors worldwide — according to comScore, a market research firm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYT Bits report on Arrington&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Millions of TechCrunch readers adopt his opinions regarding tech startups.</p></blockquote>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t have anywhere near a million readers. </p>
<blockquote cite="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/"><p>TechCrunch, which began reviewing start-ups and tech-centric news in 2005, had 650,000 unique U.S. visitors in December — and 2.17 million visitors worldwide — according to comScore, a market research firm.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/" rel="nofollow">NYT Bits report on Arrington</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Millions of TechCrunch readers adopt his opinions regarding tech startups.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He doesn&#039;t have anywhere near a million readers. 

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/&quot;&gt;TechCrunch, which began reviewing start-ups and tech-centric news in 2005, had 650,000 unique U.S. visitors in December — and 2.17 million visitors worldwide — according to comScore, a market research firm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYT Bits report on Arrington&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Millions of TechCrunch readers adopt his opinions regarding tech startups.</p></blockquote>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t have anywhere near a million readers. </p>
<blockquote cite="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/"><p>TechCrunch, which began reviewing start-ups and tech-centric news in 2005, had 650,000 unique U.S. visitors in December — and 2.17 million visitors worldwide — according to comScore, a market research firm.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/michael-arrington-of-techcrunch-goes-on-hiatus/" rel="nofollow">NYT Bits report on Arrington</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments so far - I appreciate you taking the time to share in my thoughts on this blog.  With each comment I see ways I could have written the post better to include your insights.  Thank you for the inspiration to keep writing.

@Z-lot thats a great point you make about asking yourself what you truly love doing.  I think it ties in perfectly with @Gary Patton&#039;s brilliant idea of &quot;work-life harmonization&quot;.  You&#039;re right Gary, a better goal is not to achieve a perfect balance, which @Z-lot notes is practically impossible, but to find the type of work that fits into our life in a way that complements us as individuals.  Harmony is a much better way to think of it - thanks for that Gary.

@elorant great point - there are definitely those who disagree with Arrington&#039;s opinions.  As for his passion, it&#039;s hard to judge, but I hope he finds the fresh perspective he needs to figure out what he really wants to be doing with his time.  As @garyvee says, you only get one shot at this game - you can&#039;t afford to be doing something you don&#039;t love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments so far &#8211; I appreciate you taking the time to share in my thoughts on this blog.  With each comment I see ways I could have written the post better to include your insights.  Thank you for the inspiration to keep writing.</p>
<p>@Z-lot thats a great point you make about asking yourself what you truly love doing.  I think it ties in perfectly with @Gary Patton&#8217;s brilliant idea of &#8220;work-life harmonization&#8221;.  You&#8217;re right Gary, a better goal is not to achieve a perfect balance, which @Z-lot notes is practically impossible, but to find the type of work that fits into our life in a way that complements us as individuals.  Harmony is a much better way to think of it &#8211; thanks for that Gary.</p>
<p>@elorant great point &#8211; there are definitely those who disagree with Arrington&#8217;s opinions.  As for his passion, it&#8217;s hard to judge, but I hope he finds the fresh perspective he needs to figure out what he really wants to be doing with his time.  As @garyvee says, you only get one shot at this game &#8211; you can&#8217;t afford to be doing something you don&#8217;t love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://drewskwarcan.com/blog/techcrunch-michael-arrington-and-a-lesson-in-work-life-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewskwarcan.com/?p=39#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments so far - I appreciate you taking the time to share in my thoughts on this blog.  With each comment I see ways I could have written the post better to include your insights.  Thank you for the inspiration to keep writing.

@Z-lot thats a great point you make about asking yourself what you truly love doing.  I think it ties in perfectly with @Gary Patton&#039;s brilliant idea of &quot;work-life harmonization&quot;.  You&#039;re right Gary, a better goal is not to achieve a perfect balance, which @Z-lot notes is practically impossible, but to find the type of work that fits into our life in a way that complements us as individuals.  Harmony is a much better way to think of it - thanks for that Gary.

@elorant great point - there are definitely those who disagree with Arrington&#039;s opinions.  As for his passion, it&#039;s hard to judge, but I hope he finds the fresh perspective he needs to figure out what he really wants to be doing with his time.  As @garyvee says, you only get one shot at this game - you can&#039;t afford to be doing something you don&#039;t love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments so far &#8211; I appreciate you taking the time to share in my thoughts on this blog.  With each comment I see ways I could have written the post better to include your insights.  Thank you for the inspiration to keep writing.</p>
<p>@Z-lot thats a great point you make about asking yourself what you truly love doing.  I think it ties in perfectly with @Gary Patton&#8217;s brilliant idea of &#8220;work-life harmonization&#8221;.  You&#8217;re right Gary, a better goal is not to achieve a perfect balance, which @Z-lot notes is practically impossible, but to find the type of work that fits into our life in a way that complements us as individuals.  Harmony is a much better way to think of it &#8211; thanks for that Gary.</p>
<p>@elorant great point &#8211; there are definitely those who disagree with Arrington&#8217;s opinions.  As for his passion, it&#8217;s hard to judge, but I hope he finds the fresh perspective he needs to figure out what he really wants to be doing with his time.  As @garyvee says, you only get one shot at this game &#8211; you can&#8217;t afford to be doing something you don&#8217;t love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

